Saw this in the news the other night. Location of debris and reports from witnesses indicates some sort of failure of the wing occurred in flight.
There is also a thread about this on Van's Airforce; someone there had suggested the wing spar was different than what Van's ships because the airplane allegedly was built entirely from plans. I don't know if that is possible or plausible and haven't checked that forum for followups.
Does make you wonder though if the Feds are going to get up in arms over how the rules allow someone to take a kit like the RV-6 and make such a mess of it.
Do you guys have links to the discussions on VAF? I'm curious to see what was said about the spar beforehand, as well as now that the accident has happened.
I haven't been able to find it though... any help would be appreciated
The site http://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/wiki.php?id=150887 indicates it is a "McDaniel RV-6-CH, (AKA: Chard 6)". So searching for some combination of words in that text string (e.g. "Chard 6") might help locate pre-crash discussions.
"Knox said Knopf mounted a camera on the plane before it took off a little before 3:30 p.m. in crisp, sunny weather. The plane crashed about 10 minutes later. A large chunk of the wing landed on Highway 226, nearly 2,000 feet from the fuselage."
If the camera and the images on it can be recovered, that might provide some clues.
When I someday get my own, likely all metal production aircraft is there anything that can be done to prevent this other than finding a good shop familiar with that specific model to do the annual?
A number of ASTM LSA certified airplanes are designed to be equipped with parachutes. ASTM even has standard specification for airframe emergency parachutes: http://www.astm.org/Standards/F2316.htm