SpaceX Barge Landing, from on-barge GoPro

steingar said:
Find me where they landed a rocket on its tail using rocket motors. Outside of science fiction, that is.
Lunar Excursion Module. Accomplished 6 times.

steingar said:
You find me where it landed on a barge from low orbit.
Talk about moving the target! (Or goal post.)

(The LEM did land in the Sea of Tranquility; no barge required, though.)

EDIT: Useful list of landings, soft and not so soft, on other planets:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landings_on_extraterrestrial_bodies
 
Lindberg said:
That's what I'm thinking. What's wrong with parachutes?
Parachutes don't work on the moon.
They would be too damn large on mars.

But this comes up a lot by people who seem to think SpaceX is populated with sub-standard engineers who can't see the "obvious". Suggest reading these links:

Why SpaceX Abandoned Parachuting into Water for Reusable Rockets

http://space.stackexchange.com/ques...utes-for-the-final-descent-of-the-first-stage

http://www.teslamotorsclub.com/showthread.php/30531-Why-SpaceX-Is-Using-Rocket-Powered-Landing

Lastly, here's a tour of the SpaceX rocket factory in Hawthorne California that may interest budding space entrepreneurs:

 
Lindberg said:
But parachute use without is a solved problem, and sufficient waterproofing and corrosion protection is surely feasible at a much lower cost than the barge-landing trick.
The barge landings were a temporary measure for the initial trials as a safety precaution. According to this story quoting SpaceX president Shotwell, their next attempts at landing will be on solid ground:

http://www.defensenews.com/story/de...ground-attempt-reusable-landing-sea/25827625/

The story also mentions ULA's approach, which may be closer to what you believe is a better way?
 
Back
Top