Rgbeard said:
I intended my comment to underline that people with suicidal ideations have no business carrying passengers for hire.
If the FAA never gives you a medical, they could be saving the lives of 100+ innocent passengers.
Therein lies the problem with this whole aeromedical business. It is likely nearly impossible to predict with any accuracy who is going to have a psychiatric problem across the entire population of pilots.
In hindsight, one can identify problems like Lubitz, but I don’t think most psychiatrists or psychologists think it is an exact enough science to make these kind of predictions.
Take for example the OP here, who said he was admitted to the hospital but wasn’t that seriously suicidal. Suicidal thoughts come on a spectrum, from sort of casual wondering to actually having a plan and the means to carry out it.
Yet the FAA just throws everyone with a note about “suicidality” in the same boat.
https://www.statnews.com/2016/12/14/depression-pilots/
The linked study showed that “Researchers also found that 4.1 percent of pilots reported having thoughts of being better off dead or self-harm within the past two weeks.” Yet we don’t have a huge rash of pilots crashing planes in murder suicides.
If the numbers in this study are true, it strongly suggests that the FAA’s policy may then discourage pilots from obtaining treatment and thus actually INCREASE the risk of such events.
This is the sort of unintended consequence that can be produced when trying to screen for extremely rare events. So I don’t think there is any good evidence that the FAA’s policies here have any predictive value or improve the safety of flight.
It sounds like the OP will obtain the advice of a senior HIMS AME and that he can potentially be able to obtain a medical but it will require a forensic psychiatrist evaluation and an SI.