That's going to leave a mark...

weilke said:
2700 metric tons of AN. That's probably one of the larger conventional explosions. Same ballpark as the Grandcamp and multiples of tonnage set off in the Tianjin, West and Oppau disasters.
So if my calculations are correct that the explosive power of AN by weight is about 1/12 that of TNT, then this would be the equivalent of 224 ton of TNT.

The conventional test explosion for the Trinity Test site was evidently 100 ton of TNT. So this was a bit over twice that.

The atomic explosion of The Gadget itself was about 17k ton TNT equivalent. So this was about 1/75 of the first atomic explosion.
 
Cap'n Jack said:
Not that simple. There's three different decomposition paths for ammonium nitrate. One of them is endothermic.
Yes, I guess the relative effectiveness factor is actually 0.42 for ammonium nitrate.

So this was the equivalent of 1.15 ktn TNT. Or about 1/18 of the first atomic bombs. Wow!
 
Cap'n Jack said:
I just noticed you said "both compounds" - what's the other compound other than ammonium nitrate?
TNT.

But it appears the relative effectiveness is 0.56. So even higher.
 
PPC1052 said:
Appears they forgot to correct for the difference between AN, which exploded here, and TNT. Typical clueless reporting by the MSM.

If you look at photos of what happened in Hiroshima versus what happened in Beirut, fairly clear there is a large difference in blast size. Of course, Hiroshima was an air burst versus this on the ground.
 
And now they are reporting the ammonium nitrate has been stored there since 2014 when it was abandoned by a Russian businessman.
 
Back
Top