Why aren't more women airline pilots?

asks CNN, in this rather nice piece.
Examining gender bias among airline pilots is rather late in the metaphorical career pipe to be looking for a leek or cause. A lot of the "reasons" given in that article absolutely fail to explain the gender disparity in private pilots. The whole "its a demanding career" reasoning (and all its annoying derivatives) is bunk since it doesn't explain why so few women want to fly for the sake of flying as a past-time! About half of all pilots aren't doing it as a career. Consider the statistics:

According FAA statistics (tables 1 and 2 from http://www.faa.gov/data_research/aviation_data_statistics/civil_airmen_statistics/2009/):

  • In 2000, pilot certificates held by women:
    • 5.7% (35,607 of 625,581) of all.
    • 11.3% (10,189 of 93,064) of student.
    • 5.8% (14,554 of 251,561) of private.
    • 4.6% (5,807 of 125,738) of commercial.
    • 3.1% (4,411 of 141,596) of airline transport.
  • By 2009:
    • 6.2% (36,808 of 594,285) of all.
    • 11.7% (8,450 of 72,280) of student.
    • 6.8% (14,322 of 211,619) of private.
    • 6.6% (8,289 of 125,738) of commercial.
    • 3.9% (5,636 of 144,600) of airline transport.
The gain in commercial and ATP certificates were the most significant. The percentage gain in private pilot percentage was due to entirely to having a lower attrition rate than men! But in all cases, women just didn't make up that great a percentage. Now go figure out the percentages for the non-pilot fields in those tables - one field stands out! Do any of the "reasons" stated in the article explain the percentages in those fields!?

Since only ~0.3% of all U.S. citizens who are likely eligible to become pilots ever do (assuming everyone who drives a car is eligible; ~190,000,000 drivers http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/onh00/onh2p4.htm) the low percentage of women among the piloting ranks may be simply due to a secondary causal action because of the extreme winnowing that occurs at the extremes of any bell curve.
 
Back
Top