Why do CFIs discourage midfield crosswind?

hish747

New member
For the last couple of years, CFIs I've flown with (instrument, commercial and IFR currency flights) seem to have the same response when I announce that I'm going to cross at midfield to join the left downwind. Without fail they proclaim some variant of "it's probably better to just join a regular crosswind instead of midfield". When I press them about why, they usually say "it's just a better practice" or they really don't know why but it's what they were taught.

To me this makes no sense at all. It would seem clearly better to cross at midfield where departing traffic is less likely to be climbing through my altitude. Flying a regular crosswind puts me right in the path of departing traffic. Are they worried about landing traffic making a go around?

I would appreciate thoughts from all but especially CFIs that hold this opinion.
 
Bill Jennings said:
Synthetic or dyno? N2 or air? .45ACP or 9mm? Mayo or Miracle Whip? Ginger or Mary Ann? Jeannie or Samantha? Emacs or Vi? High wing or low wing? Breast or chicken wing? Concealed carry or open carry?
What’s the confusion here ? Everyone knows .45ACP, Mary Ann, Emacs, and open carry! :emoji6:
 
brcase said:
I agree, it seems many of the pilots doing the mid-field crossing to the 45 seem to miss the 2 mile recommendation the FAA recommends.

Brian
True, and it may have something to do with that diagram. If a runway is typically about a mile long, that is badly not to scale for a two mile outleg.
 
Back
Top