L Let'sgoflying! New member Feb 11, 2012 #1 http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/02/120210133220.htm
J Jim Logajan Administrator Staff member Feb 11, 2012 #2 Let'sgoflying! said: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/02/120210133220.htm Click to expand... Probably a pretty low Reynolds number involved. Might not apply to larger bodies.
Let'sgoflying! said: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/02/120210133220.htm Click to expand... Probably a pretty low Reynolds number involved. Might not apply to larger bodies.
