So far only James Campbell has made statements and claims; couldn't find any statement from Cirrus.zaitcev said:
So far as I know, "Captain Zoom" was James R. Campbell's own chosen handle or nickname. Someone else may know why.jkgoblue said:
When you haven't got a case, find any way you can to delay the day of reckoning?Steve Foley said:
My understanding is the same as yours, since something as simple as an X is a valid signature. Absent uncontested written documents, then what generally matters in a dispute like this is how the parties acted.weilke said:
See post 43 for a mention of Jason Ward Johnson.TangoWhiskey said:
Because no single ISP can control email delivery, it doesn't really matter what requirements are placed on the receiving systems. Email delivery is a "best effort" system that no one is legally responsible for because it gets relayed from one privately owned entity to another, none of which provide any guarantees (except possibly to their own customers, and then only in regards to just their network equipment.) There isn't even any requirement that one ISP accept email from other systems. If email gets dropped enroute, tough. It is a federal crime to interfere with postal mail, but email is routinely and legally "interfered" with by a multitude of systems (e.g. spam filters that customers have no control over.)weilke said:
And they told Campbell they were quitting him back on October 8. So if the judge sees that he has had two months now to find new representation, I wonder how much time he'll have to find another one? What's the usual judicial procedure for handling somebody playing that kind of game?wanttaja said:
That's not going to work for him - when you need spin control with a Cirrus caught in a lawsuit you are always supposed to deploy the parachute.wanttaja said:
Unless I missed something, Campbell is the defendant, not the plaintiff. A legal process with rules set up under the assumption that a defendant in a civil action wants to resolve the issue would be a magnificently naive judicial system. Our system may be bad, but not that bad (I think.)kyleb said:
Get there by making it a cross country trip in the Fly Baby!wanttaja said:If one of us *does* show up, they might become part of the show. Back on one of his other cases, the wife of a RAH-15 member showed up in court. Campbell didn't like her there (though he didn't know who she was), objected to her presence, and the judge questioned her before allowing her to remain.
Maybe I should show up.
Ron Wanttaja
Oh yeah - skip to 10:20 of this video for confirmation ("Had to deal with... 9:30 in the morning to 5:30 ..."):wanttaja said:
I was wondering whether the Cirrus lawyers just did good homework or have been getting a bit of an assist....Steve Foley said:
It's only too long a thread if it contains posts made by Abraham Lincoln.wanttaja said:
Given all the facts that Cirrus and Campbell are likely to produce at trial, a different judge isn't going to change the final outcome. It appears to be a pointless move that I assume would, at most, only change the trial date a bit.3393RP said:
