Wikipedia science articles

Jim Logajan

Administrator
Staff member
This guy captures my own observations of some of the science and technical articles in Wikipedia. It hasn't become unusable, yet, but caveat lector is essential.

 
Last edited:
Having been involved fairly extensively in edits at Wikipedia regarding the Andrew Wakefield fraud I can comment on this. Basically Wikipedia now has so many rules and guidelines that an editor there can always find a reason to disapprove an edit or correction. So this creates a situation where their internal biases become essentially the determining factor in what gets in.
 
Having been involved fairly extensively in edits at Wikipedia regarding the Andrew Wakefield fraud I can comment on this. Basically Wikipedia now has so many rules and guidelines that an editor there can always find a reason to disapprove an edit or correction. So this creates a situation where their internal biases become essentially the determining factor in what gets in.
Not to mention egos. I've drawn hellfire down on myself for correcting typos.
 
Back
Top