RandomDroneGuy
Active member
Last I checked it was 4 percent. I don't worry about them. They're used to stuff looking strange.I considered using it but I suspect there are still some browsers out there that don't support it yet.
Last I checked it was 4 percent. I don't worry about them. They're used to stuff looking strange.I considered using it but I suspect there are still some browsers out there that don't support it yet.
Ah, now I remembered why I didn't upload a webp version: the server side (Xenforo forum software) doesn't support it yet. That seems odd, but I see Xenforo users have been asking the vendor to support it. Support for webp allegedly in the next release of the forum software.Last I checked it was 4 percent. I don't worry about them. They're used to stuff looking strange.
I'm surprised by that. I'm drawing a blank on what would be different on the CMS end of things.Ah, now I remembered why I didn't upload a webp version: the server side (Xenforo forum software) doesn't support it yet. That seems odd, but I see Xenforo users have been asking the vendor to support it. Support for webp allegedly in the next release of the forum software.
We (actually Peter) hired a person to help us with the graphics since neither of us have any talent in that area. We did suggest a mix of high and low wing and I specifically suggested images of Cessna and Piper models, those two being well recognized makes. We got the two high wing I think because presumably there weren't any decent non-copyrighted photos on the net of Piper aircraft with a similar viewing angle to the Cessna images. The other being, if I recall correctly, a possible unbalanced look to the header. Then there is the near-midair collision it seems to depict, which is best left unmentioned.I was looking for the one with a low wing ...
As long as we're registering graphics issues, allow me to point out that the favicon for the site is less than impressive. A few light gray lines don't really have high contrast with most backgrounds. Needs, at least, a background box.
View attachment 133
Ron Wanttaja
I like the white lines on the dark background, but I'd use dark green (if available in favicon) to go with the "Green Board" theme.We do have two other alternates in the attached image - which one(s) do you think I should substitute? Black outline on white/transparent I presume?
I like the white lines on the dark background, but I'd use dark green (if available in favicon) to go with the "Green Board" theme.
View attachment 138
Offhand, I think I'd heavy up the lines, too. Favicons are often presented in small size.
View attachment 139
Ron Wanttaja